|
| |
| Home >> Financials >> Financial Reports >>Notes Financial Statement |
|
| |
| PAKISTAN
STATE OIL COMPANY LIMITED NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Un-Audited) FOR THE QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER
30, 2006 |
 |
| 1.
|
Pakistan
State Oil Company Limited is a public company
incorporated in Pakistan under the Companies Act,
1913 (now Companies Ordinance, 1984) and is listed
on Karachi, Lahore and Islamabad stock exchanges.
The principal activity of the Company is procurement,
storage and marketing of petroleum and related
products. It also blends and markets various kinds
of lubricating oils. |
| |
|
| 2. |
These
financial statements are un-audited and are being
submitted to the shareholders In accordance with
section 245 of the Companies Ordinance, 1984 and
International Accounting Standard 34 – ‘Interim
Financial Reporting’ |
| |
|
| 3. |
The
accounting policies adopted in the preparation
of these quarterly financial statements are the
same as those applied in the preparation of the
audited published financial statements of the
Company for the year ended June 30, 2006. |
| |
|
| 4. |
PROPERTY,
PLANT AND EQUIPMENT |
| |
|
| |
| |
September
30, 2006 |
June
30, 2006 |
| Buildings
on leasehold land |
11462 |
60,715 |
| Service and
filling stations |
176,920
|
1,095,171
|
| Plant and
Machinery |
44,507
|
108,006
|
| Office Equipment |
11,016
|
57,630 |
|
| |
|
| 5. |
OTHER
RECEIVABLES |
| |
Included
in other receivable is an aggregate amount of
Rs. 17,579,841 thousand (June 30, 2006: Rs. 13,469,666
thousand) due from Government of Pakistan on account
of the following: |
| |
|
| |
| 5.1 |
In
2002 under an arrangement with the Ministry
of Petroleum and Natural Resources (MoP
& NR), Government of Pakistan (GoP),
the Company carried out an independent verification
and reconciliation of price differential
claims due from the GoP and outstanding
since 1991. Based on the exercise, the Company
recognised the resulting net difference
in its financial statements. Through its
letter No. 3(386)/2002 dated August 7, 2002
the GoP confirmed that the report on independent
verification will provide reasonable level
of comfort to the authenticity and accuracy
of outstanding import price differential
claims and accordingly against balance claimed
commenced repayment through a pricing mechanism
for which a notification was issued. Such
repayments amounted to Rs. 2,805,000 thousand
upto December 31, 2003. Since then no further
amounts have been received and the notification
for the pricing mechanism also expired on
December 31, 2004.
However, the Company is actively pursuing
the matter with the MoP & NR, GoP for
the recovery of the balance amount of Rs.
1,465,406 thousand and considers that the
balance will be recovered in due course.
Pending recovery and agreement of the amount
due from GoP, the Company, as a matter of
prudence carries a provision of Rs. 501,730
thousand (June 30, 2006: Rs. 501,730 thousand)
including a general provision of 25% (June
30, 2006: 25%) against the balance due as
at September 30, 2006. |
| |
|
| 5.2 |
Price
differential claims (PDC) aggregating to
Rs. 11,894,475 thousand due from GoP net
of recovery of Rs. 15,760,000 thousand.
These claims have arisen on the instructions
of MoP & NR for keeping the consumer
prices of certain POL products stable. The
Company together with other Oil Marketing
Companies is actively pursuing the matter
with the concerned ministries for the early
settlement of above claim. The Company considers
that the balance amount will be reimbursed
by the GoP in due course of time. |
| |
|
| 5.3 |
The balance
represents an amount due and outstanding
for a considerable period from Water and
Power Development Authority (WAPDA) on account
of the following: |
| |
|
| |
 |
First
Fill of Hub Power Company Limited
(HUBCO) pipelines of Rs. 801,866 thousand
( June30, 2006 Rs. 801,866 thousand):
Under clause 6.7 (b) of the Fuel
Supply Agreement (FSA) of 1992,
the Company supplied 128,000 metric
tons of furnace oil as “First
Fill” at no charge to HUBCO
in 1996. The stocks supplied were
duly acknowledged by HUBCO through
their certificate Ref. No. 1182.GJB
and 1262 GJB dated November 25,
1996 and December 19, 1996 respectively.
WAPDA through a letter dated August
5, 1992 jointly signed by WAPDA
and the Company undertook to pay
the cost of First Fill to the Company.
However, subsequently WAPDA, through
its letter No. GM/WPPO/CE-1/14624-26
dated December 5, 2001 refused to
pay the amount on the contention
that the project was first conceived
on Build, Operate and Transfer (BOT)
basis but later converted to Build,
Operate and Own (BOO) basis under
the Power Purchase Agreement (PPA)
between WAPDA and HUBCO and therefore
ownership of the project including
fuel inventory at the end of PPA
terms now remained with HUBCO, and
WAPDA was not liable for First Fill
to the Company. As against the WAPDA’s
contention, the Company is of the
view that the cost of First Fill
is to be paid by WAPDA as per the
letter referred above jointly signed
by both the parties. MoP & NR
through its letter dated November
17, 2003 advised the Company that
the amount due from WAPDA will now
be paid by the Ministry of Finance
(MoF) as decided by Economic Coordination
Committee (EEC) within two years.
The Company is following up the
matter with the MoF. The MoP &
NR vide its office memorandum dated
February 7, 2005 has advised the
Finance Division to take necessary
action in order to implement the
aforesaid decision of ECC. In view
of the decision of the ECC, the
Company considers that the balance
will be recovered in due course
of time.
|
| |
|
 |
Price
differential between the products
Low Sulphur Furnace Oil (LSFO) and
High Sulphur Furnace Oil (HSFO) of
Rs. 3,418,094 thousand (June 30, 2006:
Rs. 3,418,094 thousand):
In 1996, through a decision taken
at a meeting of the Privatisation
Commission, and Finance Division,
(GoP) the Company was advised to
supply LSFO to Kot Addu Power Project
at the HSFO price and WAPDA was
advised to absorb the price differential
between the two products. In accordance
with the decision of ECC dated November
4, 2003, the Company was allowed
to recover this amount through a
pricing mechanism after recovery
of the amount outstanding against
its claims for Import Price Differential
referred in note 14.1, the notification
for which expired on December 31,
2004. Although no recovery has been
made on this account, the Company
continues to follow up the matter
with MoP & NR. Last year, the
Company submitted an independent
report on the verification of the
above claim to MoP & NR, upon
their request. During the previous
year a joint reconciliation exercise
was carried out with WAPDA as per
the decision taken in a meeting
held on May 19, 2006 under the Chairmanship
of Additional Finance Secretary
(GoP). As a result of this joint
exercise the claim has been reduced
by Rs. 42,671 thousand, and the
final reconciliation statements
have been submitted to MoF and WAPDA,
and which are under review. In view
of the above, the Company considers
that the above amount will be recovered
in full in due course of time.
|
|
|
| |
|
| 6. |
CONTINGENCIES
AND COMMITMENTS |
| |
| 6.1 |
Claims
against the Company not acknowledged as
debts Rs. 131,999 thousand
(June 30, 2006: Rs. 128,911 thousand)
|
| |
|
| 6.2 |
The Company
is subject to tax demands against which
it has filed appeals. No significant changes
have occurred since the annual financial
statements for the year ended June 30, 2006. |
| |
|
| 6.3 |
The Company
may be exposed to provincial cess in respect
of certain imports. The same cess has been
levied on other companies in the industry,
who have challenged the levy at appellate
forums. The existence of the possible obligation
on the Company and the amount involved cannot
be determined with sufficient reliability.
However, the management of the Company is
confident that it will not be liable to
the levy. |
| |
|
| 6.4 |
The Company has been extended
a loan facility through Ministry of Finance
(MoF) and MoP & NR for import of POL products.
The foreign exchange allocation for these
products is guaranteed by the SBP and GoP.
Repayment of principal amount, financing cost
and foreign exchange risk are the responsibility
of MoF, GoP |
| |
|
| |
The status of loan facility
at September 30, 2006 was as follows: |
| |
|
| |
| Lender |
Amount
of facility |
Amount
outstanding
including mark-up |
Repayment
period |
| |
(US$
in million) |
|
| National
Bank of Pakistan - Bahrain |
100.0 |
101.40 |
3 Years |
|
| |
|
| 6.5 |
Commitments
in respect of contracts for capital expenditure
amount to
Rs. 559,873 thousand (June 30, 2006: Rs.
605,544 thousand).
|
| |
|
| 6.6 |
Letters
of credit and bank guarantees outstanding
amount to Rs. 585,602 thousand
(June 30, 2006: Rs. 2,449,086 thousand).
|
|
| |
|
| 7. |
TRANSACTIONS
WITH RELATED PARTIES |
| |
|
| |
| |
September
30, 2005 |
September
30, 2004 |
| Purchases |
4,130,803 |
6,464,047 |
| Dividend
income |
115,146 |
92,117 |
| Freight expense |
801,750 |
25,126 |
| Income (Pipeline
charges) |
72,988 |
11,834 |
| Expenses
charged to subsidiaries |
- |
44 |
|
| |
|
| 8. |
CORRESPONDING
FIGURES
In order to comply with the requirements
of International Accounting Standard 34 ‘Interim
Financial Reporting’, balance sheet has
been compared with the balances of annual financial
statements, whereas profit and loss account and
cash flow statement have been compared with the
balances of comparable period of immediately preceding
financial year |
| |
|
| 9. |
DATE
OF AUTHORISATION
The financial statements were authorized for issue
by the Board of Management (Oil) of the Company
on October 31, 2006 |
| |
|
| |
|
|
|